Master of Arts in Liberal Studies (MALS) - The Committee's Page
Our first words to you as GLS Final Project Committee members are: Thank you! You have committed a significant chunk of your valuable time to helping one of our students reach the final milestone of his or her academic journey to the Master of Arts in Liberal Studies (MALS) degree. We very much appreciate that commitment and, hopefully, this web page will make your task simpler.
We recommend as your first step that you become familiar with what we expect from the student. A careful read of our web page titled "MALS Final Project Instructions" located at http://www.uncw.edu/gls/curriculum-gls598.html will provide this familiarization.
Director and Reader
Director - Working with the student with a primary role of an advisory consultant ensuring the fluency and quality of the final project as well as expediting the timely completion of the project by establishing a project timetable.
Reader - Provides feedback and approval of the project as and when requested. The level of involvement of the reader is a matter of negotiation between the student, director, and reader. On one hand, some may wait until the student has written an acceptable, or even final, draft of the project before forwarding a copy of the draft to the reader for his or her feedback and approval. On the other hand, some may choose to involve the reader from the very outset of the planning and drafting process.
Student and Committee
Both the student and the committee are responsible one to the other for completing revisions and tasks competently and on-time. The project timetable mentioned above should be met; if not, it should be revised as needed and the revision met.
Artistic or Scholarly??
It's a good idea, even before you accept the director responsiblities, to ascertain not only the subject of the final project, but also its scope and direction. Two paths are possible:
Artistic - The final project can be, e.g., a personal memoir; a collection of short fiction, poetry, or personal essays; a travel narrative; a family history; a documentary or narrative film; a series of original musical compositions; an original dance performance; or an exhibition of original paintings or photographs, etc., This list is not intended to limit the possibilities, but rather to illustrate them.
In the case of a artistic work, a written analysis is required. Such a written analysis most likely would assume the form of an "artist's statement," in which the student provides a profile of his or her background in the project medium; describes various factors and influences that figured into the focus of the project; reconstructs various stages in the completion of the project; discusses any special challenges involved in the completion of the project; assesses the personal significance, meaning, and value of the project; and speculates, as relevant, on any future exhibition or performative venues for the project. Note: This "artist's statement" must be formatted in the same manner as scholarly thesis.
A written work advancing an original point of view as a result of research. Most traditional disciplines require such a work as the capstone experience of the degree experience. This work must meet all the usual requirements for a formal thesis. Specific guidance as to format will be found in the MALS Final Project Formatting Requirements Manual.
Final Project Proposal (w/form)
This document is due very early in the semester. It comes first to you and then a week later, to the GLS Program Director. When submitted to the Program Director, it must be accompanied with a form with your signature thereon. By signing it, you have agreed that the proposal is reasonable and valid and that you will act as the student's project director (or reader). For details on how it's to be structured, please see Section IV of the web page. Note: If distance or other factors make the signature an issue, an approval email to the GLS Program Director will suffice as a signature on the form.
Obviously, a clear and coherent proposal is a necessary prelude to a successful final project. However, probably the most important part of the proposal is the timeline to completion. A reasonable timeline, developed using the deadline dates published in Section IX of this web page by the GLS Program must be developed and followed as well as circumstances permit.
Timely submission of the final project proposal, with its covering form, is important for a number of reasons, not least being the completion of any administrative paperwork for the payment of a stipend to successful directors. Depending on funds availablility and the successful completion of the final project by the student in the semester of enrollment, a $200.00 stipend may be available.
Depending on the timeline developed with the student, several versions of the final project may have been reviewed by this point. However, that may not be the case. To cover the case when no version reviews have taken place, we have the deadline titled "Due date for submission of first draft of GLS 598 final projects to final project directors for Spring 2014 graduates." This deadline is established at approximately the midpoint of the semester and is intended primarily as a reminder for the student and director to review progress. Obviously, if the first draft doesn't yet exist, there are undoubtedly problems. So, if the director (or the student) feel that progress is not sufficient to indicate a completion in the current semester, they should take action to postpone completion until the next or later semester. Please note that postponement, especially from the first semester's attempt, is not unusual. There are, however, administrative actions to accomplish postponement so please ask the student to contact Perry Campbell (910.962.3590 - email@example.com) for assistance.
Once you, the reader, and the student agree that the written product is very close, if not perfect, a properly formatted and signed "review copy" must be submitted to the GLS Director for review and approval. Achieving an acceptable review copy can be difficult and time consuming. Directors should advise the student to allow for ample time to format the project correctly following the guidelines in the formatting manual. However, it is the student's responsibility to ensure the written product is properly formatted.
The usual deadline for this submission is three weeks before the end of classes in the semester of enrollment. As with the final project proposal, the signature requirement can be met by an email from the committee member to the GLS Director indicating approval.
Sometime during the three weeks, the GLS Director will review the written work. This review will result in one of the three emails delinated below being sent to the student. The project director and the GLS Program Assistant will also receive copies.
- The email will indicate that there are no errors in the written work and the student may proceed to the oral final defense.
- The email will indicate that although there are errors in the written work, the student may proceed to the oral final defense if/when the specified errors are corrected.
- The email will indicate that there are many significant errors in the writted work. If reasonable, they will be specified in the email. In any case, the review copy will be returned and must be resubmitted after the specified errors have been corrected. The student may not go to the oral defense until the re-review has been done and the project is approved. Once approved, the student may proceed to the final defense.
In instances 1. and 2. above, once all errors are corrected, the student must prepare the three binding copies and bring these copies to the final defense for signature by the committee. In instance 3., the binding copies are also made, and signed at the oral defense, but not until final approval has been made.
As the oral defense is essentially a guaranteed pass, the committee should not permit the student to go to the oral defense unless they are satisfied that a reasonable and proper oral defense will be made.
Location and Scheduling
After the written review copy has been submitted, but before it is approved, the student can and should coordinate possible dates/times with the committee. The GLS Program Assistant will, at the student's request, tentatively reserve the GLS Conference Room for the defense. If the written project is not approved by the date/time of the tentative reservation, a new date/time must be set.
When the written review copy is approved, the student, after coordinating with his committee, can arrange a room reservation with the GLS Program Assistant or make a previously tentative arrangement permanent.
All MALS oral defenses, unless the student expects more than 14 attendees, are held in Bear 110 (GLS Conference Room). If a committee member is a UNCW faculty person and wishes to arrange the defense in a room of his or her department, he or she should notify the GLS Program Assistant.
Defenses can, at need, be held in Jacksonville (normally Onslow County Extension students). The UNCW Extension Program Office (910.455.2310) is the appropriate point-of-contact. Room requests must identify any equipment needs.
Remote defenses are also possible for students or committee members. If one person (or a group of persons at one location) are remotely located, Skype is generally used to establish the remote participation. If there are more than one remote entities, arrangements can be made to use the Distance Education classrooms here at UNCW. As much advance notification as possible is desirable to enable arrangements to be made.
Each committee member is asked to assess our program. There are two assessment tools. One is oriented to the "artistic" final project; the other towards the "scholarly" final project. The appropriate forms will be provided to committee members either at the oral defense or via email shortly thereafter. Committee members are asked to return the assessments to the GLS Program Director within 5 working days after the oral defense.
For specifics on the assessment process, please click on the Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Summary.
Click on "Testimonials" above to review submissions by Michelle Bliss and Ashley Hudson. Stay tuned -- more to follow.
Last Update: February 28, 2014