UNCW Home UNCW HomeBreaking News! Click here for details.

 Faculty Senate

Minutes

|

 
Tuesday, 15 March 2005
 
See Agenda
 
Meeting 2005-07

Roll call

Absent: Chen (History), Honchell (Curricular Studies), Howell (Economics & Finance), Hurdle (Social Work), Roer (Graduate School), Simmons (Anthropology), Snowden (Budget Committee) Weber (Communication Studies)

Approval of minutes

February minutes were approved.

Individual reports

  1. Chancellor Rosemary DePaolo reported, including the following:
  2. Senate President Daniel Noland announced that coordination of the interdisciplinary Leadership Studies minor is being moved from the College of Arts and Sciences to the School of Education. Under the expedited procedure, this was approved on behalf of the faculty by the Senate president and the chair of the University Curriculum Committee.

Committee reports

  1. The following motion by the Academic Standards Committee was defeated [Motion 2005-07-13; remove majors from diplomas; defeated]:

         Whereas the practice of indicating majors on diplomas was not a practice at UNCW before 1991 and is not a practice at most schools; and
         Whereas this practice has led to problems for former students coming back to UNCW to get a second degree; and
         Whereas the diploma is only a decorative symbol of graduation from UNCW; the actual record is the student’s transcript; therefore,
         Be it resolved, that indications of majors no longer be printed on undergraduate diplomas at UNCW.

[After considerable discussion, the motion was defeated. Several senators argued that a student who subsequent to graduation fulfills requirements for a second major in the same degree should have the right to get or purchase a reprinted diploma listing both majors.]

  1. The following motion by the Steering Committee was defeated [Motion 2005-07-14; define collegiality in RTP evaluation; defeated]:

    That Section IV of the RTP Criteria document be revised as follows [additions; text not underlined is current language]:

    IV. Guidelines for tenure and academic rank

    The overall goal of Guidelines is to ensure continued professional growth of the faculty. Guidelines should emphasize excellence in teaching and professional activity in order both to reward individual faculty and to further the university's goal of excellence.

    A. Tenure

    Because of their long-term consequences for the university and its faculty, tenure decisions are more important than promotion decisions. To be granted tenure at any academic level, a faculty member must have evidenced proficiency and a pattern of growth in areas of teaching; scholarship and research/artistic achievement; and service. Of these, teaching effectiveness is the primary criterion for the granting of tenure. When a faculty member who has served two years or longer at the rank of assistant professor is recommended for permanent tenure, he/she will also be recommended for promotion. Accordingly, when there is a recommendation for conferral of tenure but at the rank of assistant professor, the recommendation will explain the special or unusual circumstances for not also recommending promotion.

    B. Academic rank
    1. Assistant professor

    For appointment to the rank of assistant professor a candidate shall show promise as a teacher and evidence of progress in the area of research or artistic achievement.

    2. Associate professor

    For appointment to the rank of associate professor a candidate shall show evidence of having developed into an effective teacher, of a continuing pattern of research or artistic achievement, of regular professional service, and of scholarship and professional development.

    3. Professor

    For appointment to the rank of professor a candidate shall have exhibited during her/his career distinguished accomplishment in teaching, a tangible record of research or artistic achievement, and a significant record of service. An individual with the rank of professor should have a reputation as an excellent teacher and be recognized as a scholar within her/his professional field.

    C. A note on collegiality

    Professional collegiality is among the factors that should be considered in assessing the teaching, research/artistic achievement, and service of RTP candidates. Collegiality is defined as: a willingness to work toward achieving the broad goals of the University, college/school, and department; the ability to interact with other faculty members—whether in agreement or dissent—in accord with civility and professional courtesy; and contribution to the governance of the University, college/school, or department by responding to the need to serve on appointed committees. Collegiality must always be distinct from and unrelated to conformity of thought and expression, and it must never be confused with the absence of criticism or dissent or with congeniality. Chapter VI of The Code of the University of North Carolina guarantees that faculty members shall enjoy academic freedom and protects faculty in "their responsible exercise of the freedom to teach, to learn, and otherwise to seek and to speak the truth."

    [Debate was lengthy and animated but not uncollegial. Much discussion centered on whether the university would benefit from having an implicit criterion made explicit. The motion was defeated.]

  2. The following motion by the University Curriculum Committee carried [Motion 2005-07-15; approve German Studies major; carried]:

Adjournment

Minutes by Richard Veit, Senate secretary